<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
 <collection>
  

 
<record>
 <datafield tag="088" ind1="" ind2="">
  <subfield code="a">Atac_STRC2021</subfield> 
  </datafield>
<datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="0">
<subfield code="p">TRANSP-OR</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="980" ind1="" ind2="">
<subfield code="a">TALK</subfield>
</datafield>
 <datafield tag="700" ind1="" ind2="">
  <subfield code="a">Atac, Selin</subfield> 
  </datafield>
 <datafield tag="700" ind1="" ind2="">
  <subfield code="a">Obrenovic, Nikola</subfield> 
  </datafield>
 <datafield tag="700" ind1="" ind2="">
  <subfield code="a">Bierlaire, Michel</subfield> 
  </datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="" ind2="">
<subfield code="a">
A multi-objective approach for station clustering in bike sharing systems</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1="" ind2="">
<subfield code="c">2021</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="711" ind1="2" ind2="">
<subfield code="a">
21st Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC)</subfield>
<subfield code="c">
Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland</subfield>
<subfield code="d">September 14, 2021</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1="" ind2="">
<subfield code="a">
Increasing environmental concerns direct people to more sustainable solutions in all fields. In transportation, one of those solutions is vehicle sharing systems. Although these systems are convenient for the users, it creates many operational challenges, such as imbalance of the vehicles throughout the service area. Usually, staff-based rebalancing operations are conducted to maintain the balance, thus to provide higher level of service. These operations become difficult to solve with the increasing number of stations. Therefore, some heuristic approaches such as clustering are used to split the problem into smaller sub problems.
This paper focuses on bike sharing systems with static rebalancing operations. Two multi-objective mathematical models are specifically crafted for the rebalancing-oriented clustering problem. These models and two agglomerative hierarchical clustering approaches are compared with respect to resulting cost of rebalancing operations.</subfield>
</datafield>
  </record>



  </collection>
